18-3805 United States v. El Bahnasawy UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 3rd day of June, two thousand twenty. PRESENT: RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, MICHAEL H. PARK, WILLIAM J. NARDINI, Circuit Judges. —————————————————————— UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. No. 18-3805 ABDULRAHMAN EL BAHNASAWY Defendant-Appellant. —————————————————————— FOR APPELLANT: ANDREW J. FRISCH, Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP, New York, NY. 1 FOR APPELLEE: GEORGE TURNER, Assistant United States Attorney (Negar Tekeei, Karl Metzner, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief), for Geoffrey S. Berman, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY. Appeal from a judgment of conviction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard M. Berman, Judge). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Defendant-Appellant Abdulrahman El Bahnasawy appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Berman, J.) following El Bahnasawy’s guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement to seven counts including: (1) conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332a; (2) conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332b; (3) conspiracy to bomb a place of public use and public transportation system, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f; (4) conspiracy to provide material support and resources to terrorists, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339A; (5) provision and attempted provision of material support and resources to terrorists, in violation of 2 18 U.S.C. § 2339A; (6) conspiracy to provide material support and resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339B; and (7) provision and attempted provision of material support and resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339B. On December 19, 2018, the district court sentenced El Bahnasawy to forty years’ imprisonment, to be followed by a lifetime term of supervised release. On appeal, El Bahnasawy argues that (1) the district court committed reversible error in declining to relieve the Federal Defenders as co-counsel, and (2) his sentence was substantively unreasonable. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts …Original document

This content is restricted to site members only. If you are an existing user, please log in to "My Account". New users may register here 

Existing Users Log In
   
New User Registration
*Required field